can: c_can: remove obsolete STRICT_FRAME_ORDERING Kconfig option

In 2b9aecdce2 ("can: c_can: Disable rx split as workaround") a new Kconfig
option was introduced as a workaround. The tests performed by Alexander Stein
confirmed this option to be obsolete with all the other cleanups and fixes
that had been discussed that time:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-can&m=139746476821294&w=2

Both (author and tester) agreed to remove this Kconfig option again:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-can&m=139883820714229&w=2

As some more cleanups took place since then a simple revert is not possible.
This patch removes the entire option as it would behave when disabled.
Further beautification’s can be done later.

Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/Kconfig b/drivers/net/can/c_can/Kconfig
index 8ab7103d4f44ea616ae8cb945eda8ea84aa3059b..61ffc12d8fd8e4e01056b06fd3ae73be7abe513e 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/Kconfig
@@ -14,13 +14,6 @@ config CAN_C_CAN_PLATFORM
          SPEAr1310 and SPEAr320 evaluation boards & TI (www.ti.com)
          boards like am335x, dm814x, dm813x and dm811x.
 
-config CAN_C_CAN_STRICT_FRAME_ORDERING
-       bool "Force a strict RX CAN frame order (may cause frame loss)"
-       ---help---
-         The RX split buffer prevents packet reordering but can cause packet
-         loss. Only enable this option when you accept to lose CAN frames
-         in favour of getting the received CAN frames in the correct order.
-
 config CAN_C_CAN_PCI
        tristate "Generic PCI Bus based C_CAN/D_CAN driver"
        depends on PCI

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
index a2ca820b5373841d2083d8d5de02fa9fce6c0ecf..95e04e2002daec774d394d0f0912ca7e952f280f 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
@@ -732,26 +732,12 @@ static u32 c_can_adjust_pending(u32 pend)
 static inline void c_can_rx_object_get(struct net_device *dev,
                                       struct c_can_priv *priv, u32 obj)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CAN_C_CAN_STRICT_FRAME_ORDERING
-       if (obj < C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST)
-               c_can_object_get(dev, IF_RX, obj, IF_COMM_RCV_LOW);
-       else
-#endif
                c_can_object_get(dev, IF_RX, obj, priv->comm_rcv_high);
 }
 
 static inline void c_can_rx_finalize(struct net_device *dev,
                                     struct c_can_priv *priv, u32 obj)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CAN_C_CAN_STRICT_FRAME_ORDERING
-       if (obj < C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST)
-               priv->rxmasked |= BIT(obj - 1);
-       else if (obj == C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST) {
-               priv->rxmasked = 0;
-               /* activate all lower message objects */
-               c_can_activate_all_lower_rx_msg_obj(dev, IF_RX);
-       }
-#endif
        if (priv->type != BOSCH_D_CAN)
                c_can_object_get(dev, IF_RX, obj, IF_COMM_CLR_NEWDAT);
 }
@@ -799,9 +785,6 @@ static inline u32 c_can_get_pending(struct c_can_priv *priv)
 {
        u32 pend = priv->read_reg(priv, C_CAN_NEWDAT1_REG);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_CAN_C_CAN_STRICT_FRAME_ORDERING
-       pend &= ~priv->rxmasked;
-#endif
        return pend;
 }
 
@@ -814,25 +797,6 @@ static inline u32 c_can_get_pending(struct c_can_priv *priv)
  * has arrived. To work-around this issue, we keep two groups of message
  * objects whose partitioning is defined by C_CAN_MSG_OBJ_RX_SPLIT.
  *
- * If CONFIG_CAN_C_CAN_STRICT_FRAME_ORDERING = y
- *
- * To ensure in-order frame reception we use the following
- * approach while re-activating a message object to receive further
- * frames:
- * - if the current message object number is lower than
- *   C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST, do not clear the NEWDAT bit while clearing
- *   the INTPND bit.
- * - if the current message object number is equal to
- *   C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST then clear the NEWDAT bit of all lower
- *   receive message objects.
- * - if the current message object number is greater than
- *   C_CAN_MSG_RX_LOW_LAST then clear the NEWDAT bit of
- *   only this message object.
- *
- * This can cause packet loss!
- *
- * If CONFIG_CAN_C_CAN_STRICT_FRAME_ORDERING = n
- *
  * We clear the newdat bit right away.
  *
  * This can result in packet reordering when the readout is slow.