Add back FAIR_SLEEPERS and GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS.
FAIR_SLEEPERS is the old logic: credit sleepers with their sleep time.
GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS dampens this a bit: 50% of their sleep time gets
credited.
The hope here is to still give the benefits of fair-sleepers logic
(quick wakeups, etc.) while not allow them to have 100% of their
sleep time as if they were running.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
 
        if (!initial) {
                /* sleeps upto a single latency don't count. */
-               if (sched_feat(NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS)) {
+               if (sched_feat(FAIR_SLEEPERS)) {
                        unsigned long thresh = sysctl_sched_latency;
 
                        /*
                                         task_of(se)->policy != SCHED_IDLE))
                                thresh = calc_delta_fair(thresh, se);
 
+                       /*
+                        * Halve their sleep time's effect, to allow
+                        * for a gentler effect of sleepers:
+                        */
+                       if (sched_feat(GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS))
+                               thresh >>= 1;
+
                        vruntime -= thresh;
                }
        }
 
  * considers the task to be running during that period. This gives it
  * a service deficit on wakeup, allowing it to run sooner.
  */
-SCHED_FEAT(NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS, 0)
+SCHED_FEAT(FAIR_SLEEPERS, 1)
+
+/*
+ * Only give sleepers 50% of their service deficit. This allows
+ * them to run sooner, but does not allow tons of sleepers to
+ * rip the spread apart.
+ */
+SCHED_FEAT(GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS, 1)
 
 /*
  * By not normalizing the sleep time, heavy tasks get an effective