ring-buffer: Fix advance of reader in rb_buffer_peek()

When calling rb_buffer_peek() from ring_buffer_consume() and a
padding event is returned, the function rb_advance_reader() is
called twice. This may lead to missing samples or under high
workloads to the warning below. This patch fixes this. If a padding
event is returned by rb_buffer_peek() it will be consumed by the
calling function now.

Also, I simplified some code in ring_buffer_consume().

------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at /dev/shm/.source/linux/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:2289 rb_advance_reader+0x2e/0xc5()
Hardware name: Anaheim
Modules linked in:
Pid: 29, comm: events/2 Tainted: G        W  2.6.31-rc3-oprofile-x86_64-standard-00059-g5050dc2 #1
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8106776f>] ? rb_advance_reader+0x2e/0xc5
[<ffffffff81039ffe>] warn_slowpath_common+0x77/0x8f
[<ffffffff8103a025>] warn_slowpath_null+0xf/0x11
[<ffffffff8106776f>] rb_advance_reader+0x2e/0xc5
[<ffffffff81068bda>] ring_buffer_consume+0xa0/0xd2
[<ffffffff81326933>] op_cpu_buffer_read_entry+0x21/0x9e
[<ffffffff810be3af>] ? __find_get_block+0x4b/0x165
[<ffffffff8132749b>] sync_buffer+0xa5/0x401
[<ffffffff810be3af>] ? __find_get_block+0x4b/0x165
[<ffffffff81326c1b>] ? wq_sync_buffer+0x0/0x78
[<ffffffff81326c76>] wq_sync_buffer+0x5b/0x78
[<ffffffff8104aa30>] worker_thread+0x113/0x1ac
[<ffffffff8104dd95>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
[<ffffffff8104a91d>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x1ac
[<ffffffff8104dc9a>] kthread+0x88/0x92
[<ffffffff8100bdba>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
[<ffffffff8104dc12>] ? kthread+0x0/0x92
[<ffffffff8100bdb0>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
---[ end trace f561c0a58fcc89bd ]---

Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 2606cee433dae247fb6919ecefc31736274d9ac8..d4d3580a894a7f39bda320841d6baf70487eec91 100644 (file)
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -2383,7 +2383,6 @@ rb_buffer_peek(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu, u64 *ts)
                 * the box. Return the padding, and we will release
                 * the current locks, and try again.
                 */
-               rb_advance_reader(cpu_buffer);
                return event;
 
        case RINGBUF_TYPE_TIME_EXTEND:
@@ -2519,6 +2518,8 @@ ring_buffer_peek(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu, u64 *ts)
        if (dolock)
                spin_lock(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock);
        event = rb_buffer_peek(buffer, cpu, ts);
+       if (event && event->type_len == RINGBUF_TYPE_PADDING)
+               rb_advance_reader(cpu_buffer);
        if (dolock)
                spin_unlock(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock);
        local_irq_restore(flags);
@@ -2590,12 +2591,9 @@ ring_buffer_consume(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu, u64 *ts)
                spin_lock(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock);
 
        event = rb_buffer_peek(buffer, cpu, ts);
-       if (!event)
-               goto out_unlock;
-
-       rb_advance_reader(cpu_buffer);
+       if (event)
+               rb_advance_reader(cpu_buffer);
 
- out_unlock:
        if (dolock)
                spin_unlock(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock);
        local_irq_restore(flags);