]> www.infradead.org Git - users/dwmw2/linux.git/commitdiff
lockdep: Fix preemption WARN for spurious IRQ-enable
authorPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:23:02 +0000 (12:23 +0200)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Thu, 5 Nov 2020 10:51:12 +0000 (11:51 +0100)
[ Upstream commit f8e48a3dca060e80f672d398d181db1298fbc86c ]

It is valid (albeit uncommon) to call local_irq_enable() without first
having called local_irq_disable(). In this case we enter
lockdep_hardirqs_on*() with IRQs enabled and trip a preemption warning
for using __this_cpu_read().

Use this_cpu_read() instead to avoid the warning.

Fixes: 4d004099a6 ("lockdep: Fix lockdep recursion")
Reported-by: syzbot+53f8ce8bbc07924b6417@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kernel/locking/lockdep.c

index 85d15f0362dc56d9f605dee4ba259ae1cc4439c8..3eb35ad1b524159892b4cb734a606472e5c4d576 100644 (file)
@@ -3681,7 +3681,7 @@ void lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare(unsigned long ip)
        if (unlikely(in_nmi()))
                return;
 
-       if (unlikely(__this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion)))
+       if (unlikely(this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion)))
                return;
 
        if (unlikely(lockdep_hardirqs_enabled())) {
@@ -3750,7 +3750,7 @@ void noinstr lockdep_hardirqs_on(unsigned long ip)
                goto skip_checks;
        }
 
-       if (unlikely(__this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion)))
+       if (unlikely(this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion)))
                return;
 
        if (lockdep_hardirqs_enabled()) {