If it jumps to nomem_one, the total allocated number is not changed. So
we don't need to adjust it.
For the nomem_bulk case, we know there is a valid mas->alloc. So we don't
need to do the check.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241015120746.15850-3-richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
Cc: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
nomem_bulk:
/* Clean up potential freed allocations on bulk failure */
memset(slots, 0, max_req * sizeof(unsigned long));
+ mas->alloc->total = allocated;
nomem_one:
mas_set_alloc_req(mas, requested);
- if (mas->alloc && !(((unsigned long)mas->alloc & 0x1)))
- mas->alloc->total = allocated;
mas_set_err(mas, -ENOMEM);
}