The 'inc' parameter of lockevent_add() and the cond parameter of
lockevent_cond_inc() are only evaluated when CONFIG_LOCK_EVENT_COUNTS
is on. That can cause problem if those parameters are expressions
with side effect like a "++". Fix this by evaluating those non-event
parameters once even if CONFIG_LOCK_EVENT_COUNTS is off. This will also
eliminate the need of the __maybe_unused attribute to the wait_early
local variable in pv_wait_node().
Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240319005004.1692705-1-longman@redhat.com
#else /* CONFIG_LOCK_EVENT_COUNTS */
#define lockevent_inc(ev)
-#define lockevent_add(ev, c)
-#define lockevent_cond_inc(ev, c)
+#define lockevent_add(ev, c) do { (void)(c); } while (0)
+#define lockevent_cond_inc(ev, c) do { (void)(c); } while (0)
#endif /* CONFIG_LOCK_EVENT_COUNTS */
{
struct pv_node *pn = (struct pv_node *)node;
struct pv_node *pp = (struct pv_node *)prev;
- bool __maybe_unused wait_early;
+ bool wait_early;
int loop;
for (;;) {