There does not need to be an explicit restriction that unconfined
can't use change_hat. Traditionally unconfined doesn't have hats
so change_hat could not be used. But newer unconfined profiles have
the potential of having hats, and even system unconfined will be
able to be replaced with a profile that allows for hats.
To remain backwards compitible with expected return codes, continue
to return -EPERM if the unconfined profile does not have any hats.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
static struct aa_sfs_entry aa_sfs_entry_domain[] = {
AA_SFS_FILE_BOOLEAN("change_hat", 1),
AA_SFS_FILE_BOOLEAN("change_hatv", 1),
+ AA_SFS_FILE_BOOLEAN("unconfined_allowed_children", 1),
AA_SFS_FILE_BOOLEAN("change_onexec", 1),
AA_SFS_FILE_BOOLEAN("change_profile", 1),
AA_SFS_FILE_BOOLEAN("stack", 1),
if (task_no_new_privs(current) && !unconfined(label) && !ctx->nnp)
ctx->nnp = aa_get_label(label);
+ /* return -EPERM when unconfined doesn't have children to avoid
+ * changing the traditional error code for unconfined.
+ */
if (unconfined(label)) {
- info = "unconfined can not change_hat";
- error = -EPERM;
- goto fail;
+ struct label_it i;
+ bool empty = true;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ label_for_each_in_ns(i, labels_ns(label), label, profile) {
+ empty &= list_empty(&profile->base.profiles);
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ if (empty) {
+ info = "unconfined can not change_hat";
+ error = -EPERM;
+ goto fail;
+ }
}
if (count) {