commit 
fbf1c41fc0f4d3574ac2377245efd666c1fa3075 upstream.
Commit 
0a94efb5acbb ("workqueue: implicit ordered attribute should be
overridable") introduced a __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT flag but gave it the
same value as __WQ_LEGACY.  I don't believe these were intended to
mean the same thing, so renumber __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT.
Fixes: 0a94efb5acbb ("workqueue: implicit ordered attribute should be ...")
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
 
 
        __WQ_DRAINING           = 1 << 16, /* internal: workqueue is draining */
        __WQ_ORDERED            = 1 << 17, /* internal: workqueue is ordered */
-       __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT   = 1 << 18, /* internal: alloc_ordered_workqueue() */
        __WQ_LEGACY             = 1 << 18, /* internal: create*_workqueue() */
+       __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT   = 1 << 19, /* internal: alloc_ordered_workqueue() */
 
        WQ_MAX_ACTIVE           = 512,    /* I like 512, better ideas? */
        WQ_MAX_UNBOUND_PER_CPU  = 4,      /* 4 * #cpus for unbound wq */