]> www.infradead.org Git - users/jedix/linux-maple.git/commitdiff
mm/cma: using per-CMA locks to improve concurrent allocation performance
authorGe Yang <yangge1116@126.com>
Mon, 10 Feb 2025 01:56:06 +0000 (09:56 +0800)
committerAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Sat, 22 Mar 2025 05:03:10 +0000 (22:03 -0700)
For different CMAs, concurrent allocation of CMA memory ideally should not
require synchronization using locks.  Currently, a global cma_mutex lock
is employed to synchronize all CMA allocations, which can impact the
performance of concurrent allocations across different CMAs.

To test the performance impact, follow these steps:
1. Boot the kernel with the command line argument hugetlb_cma=30G to
   allocate a 30GB CMA area specifically for huge page allocations. (note:
   on my machine, which has 3 nodes, each node is initialized with 10G of
   CMA)
2. Use the dd command with parameters if=/dev/zero of=/dev/shm/file bs=1G
   count=30 to fully utilize the CMA area by writing zeroes to a file in
   /dev/shm.
3. Open three terminals and execute the following commands simultaneously:
   (Note: Each of these commands attempts to allocate 10GB [2621440 * 4KB
   pages] of CMA memory.)
   On Terminal 1: time echo 2621440 > /sys/kernel/debug/cma/hugetlb1/alloc
   On Terminal 2: time echo 2621440 > /sys/kernel/debug/cma/hugetlb2/alloc
   On Terminal 3: time echo 2621440 > /sys/kernel/debug/cma/hugetlb3/alloc

We attempt to allocate pages through the CMA debug interface and use the
time command to measure the duration of each allocation.
Performance comparison:
             Without this patch      With this patch
Terminal1        ~7s                     ~7s
Terminal2       ~14s                     ~8s
Terminal3       ~21s                     ~7s

To solve problem above, we could use per-CMA locks to improve concurrent
allocation performance.  This would allow each CMA to be managed
independently, reducing the need for a global lock and thus improving
scalability and performance.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1739152566-744-1-git-send-email-yangge1116@126.com
Signed-off-by: Ge Yang <yangge1116@126.com>
Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
mm/cma.c
mm/cma.h

index 09322b8284bdebdc1aac296f8b6ed06e8aea5298..b06d5fe73399f2a9232c55fd0fc7b2207b990c48 100644 (file)
--- a/mm/cma.c
+++ b/mm/cma.c
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@
 
 struct cma cma_areas[MAX_CMA_AREAS];
 unsigned int cma_area_count;
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(cma_mutex);
 
 static int __init __cma_declare_contiguous_nid(phys_addr_t base,
                        phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t limit,
@@ -175,6 +174,8 @@ static void __init cma_activate_area(struct cma *cma)
 
        spin_lock_init(&cma->lock);
 
+       mutex_init(&cma->alloc_mutex);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_CMA_DEBUGFS
        INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&cma->mem_head);
        spin_lock_init(&cma->mem_head_lock);
@@ -813,9 +814,9 @@ static int cma_range_alloc(struct cma *cma, struct cma_memrange *cmr,
                spin_unlock_irq(&cma->lock);
 
                pfn = cmr->base_pfn + (bitmap_no << cma->order_per_bit);
-               mutex_lock(&cma_mutex);
+               mutex_lock(&cma->alloc_mutex);
                ret = alloc_contig_range(pfn, pfn + count, MIGRATE_CMA, gfp);
-               mutex_unlock(&cma_mutex);
+               mutex_unlock(&cma->alloc_mutex);
                if (ret == 0) {
                        page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
                        break;
index df7fc623b7a6283fc969c634c2bafd00f4482780..41a3ab0ec3deb4dd9fdfb2aa4f52982e8b3a1f99 100644 (file)
--- a/mm/cma.h
+++ b/mm/cma.h
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ struct cma {
        unsigned long   available_count;
        unsigned int order_per_bit; /* Order of pages represented by one bit */
        spinlock_t      lock;
+       struct mutex alloc_mutex;
 #ifdef CONFIG_CMA_DEBUGFS
        struct hlist_head mem_head;
        spinlock_t mem_head_lock;