Commit 
83fd9c7 changes l_level, l_requested and l_blocking of
ocfs2_lock_res from int to unsigned char. But actually it is
initially as -1(ocfs2_lock_res_init_common) which
correspoding to 255 for unsigned char. So the whole dlm lock
mechanism doesn't work now which means a disaster to ocfs2.
Cc: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
        char                     l_name[OCFS2_LOCK_ID_MAX_LEN];
        unsigned int             l_ro_holders;
        unsigned int             l_ex_holders;
-       unsigned char            l_level;
+       char                     l_level;
+       char                     l_requested;
+       char                     l_blocking;
 
        /* Data packed - type enum ocfs2_lock_type */
        unsigned char            l_type;
        unsigned char            l_action;
        /* Data packed - enum type ocfs2_unlock_action */
        unsigned char            l_unlock_action;
-       unsigned char            l_requested;
-       unsigned char            l_blocking;
        unsigned int             l_pending_gen;
 
        spinlock_t               l_lock;