selftests: net: reuseport_bpf_numa: don't fail if no numa support

The reuseport_bpf_numa test case fails there's no numa support.  The
test shouldn't fail if there's no support it should be skipped.

Fixes: 3c2c3c16aaf6 ("reuseport, bpf: add test case for bpf_get_numa_node_id")
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c
index 365c32e841897e0c43e8372a21086d1ccabe35c5..c9f478b40996d3bc0037c8e3b08dc477725a85d0 100644 (file)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/reuseport_bpf_numa.c
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
 #include <unistd.h>
 #include <numa.h>
 
+#include "../kselftest.h"
+
 static const int PORT = 8888;
 
 static void build_rcv_group(int *rcv_fd, size_t len, int family, int proto)
@@ -229,7 +231,7 @@ int main(void)
        int *rcv_fd, nodes;
 
        if (numa_available() < 0)
-               error(1, errno, "no numa api support");
+               ksft_exit_skip("no numa api support\n");
 
        nodes = numa_max_node() + 1;