The sp_pri_to_cos[] array size depends on the config but lets say it is
BX_E3B0_MAX_NUM_COS_PORT0 and max_num_of_cos is also
DCBX_E3B0_MAX_NUM_COS_PORT0. In the original code
"pri == max_num_of_cos" was accepted but it is one past the end of the
array.
Also we used "pri" before capping it. It's a harmless read past the end
of the array, but it would affect which error message gets printed.
(cherry picked from commit
7e5998aa74065d3ab31d17e667f40ffebf4b8425)
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Eilon Greenstein <eilong@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Joe Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com>
const u8 max_num_of_cos = (port) ? DCBX_E3B0_MAX_NUM_COS_PORT1 :
DCBX_E3B0_MAX_NUM_COS_PORT0;
+ if (pri >= max_num_of_cos) {
+ DP(NETIF_MSG_LINK, "bnx2x_ets_e3b0_sp_pri_to_cos_set invalid "
+ "parameter Illegal strict priority\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
if (sp_pri_to_cos[pri] != DCBX_INVALID_COS) {
DP(NETIF_MSG_LINK, "bnx2x_ets_e3b0_sp_pri_to_cos_set invalid "
"parameter There can't be two COS's with "
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (pri > max_num_of_cos) {
- DP(NETIF_MSG_LINK, "bnx2x_ets_e3b0_sp_pri_to_cos_set invalid "
- "parameter Illegal strict priority\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
sp_pri_to_cos[pri] = cos_entry;
return 0;