iio: adc: ad9467: return ENODEV vs EINVAL in ad9467_setup()

The proper error code should be ENODEV (vs EINVAL) in case the chip ID
isn't recognized.

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200916082221.72851-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
index 9c3ab46e4d88fe026a9d077a720bbf13bde2b5d1..f068256cfca94a8141154f71cbed60de5f75bf76 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int ad9467_setup(struct ad9467_state *st, unsigned int chip_id)
                                  AN877_ADC_OUTPUT_MODE_TWOS_COMPLEMENT;
                return 0;
        default:
-               return -EINVAL;
+               return -ENODEV;
        }
 }