md/raid5: Fix spelling mistakes in comments

Fix spelling of 'waitting' in comments.

Signed-off-by: XU pengfei <xupengfei@nfschina.com>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
index f4e1cc1ece43de71cac64281346f0f9386859dd4..058d82e7fa13c70ebf73289a1e79cbadde81fe29 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
@@ -1327,9 +1327,9 @@ static void r5l_write_super_and_discard_space(struct r5l_log *log,
         * superblock is updated to new log tail. Updating superblock (either
         * directly call md_update_sb() or depend on md thread) must hold
         * reconfig mutex. On the other hand, raid5_quiesce is called with
-        * reconfig_mutex hold. The first step of raid5_quiesce() is waitting
-        * for all IO finish, hence waitting for reclaim thread, while reclaim
-        * thread is calling this function and waitting for reconfig mutex. So
+        * reconfig_mutex hold. The first step of raid5_quiesce() is waiting
+        * for all IO finish, hence waiting for reclaim thread, while reclaim
+        * thread is calling this function and waiting for reconfig mutex. So
         * there is a deadlock. We workaround this issue with a trylock.
         * FIXME: we could miss discard if we can't take reconfig mutex
         */