drm/xe/ct: drop irq usage of xa_erase()

Unclear why disabling interrupts is needed here. Nothing seems to be
touching fence_lookup and its corresponding lock from an irq so there
should be no risk of deadlock.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241001084346.98516-8-matthew.auld@intel.com

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
index d3de2e6d690ffc4b56d911b2a95cef61adcf511b..3fd1d4e97528b6ec431b84c984bb6675a802ab0c 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
@@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ retry_same_fence:
                        goto retry_same_fence;
 
                if (!g2h_fence_needs_alloc(&g2h_fence))
-                       xa_erase_irq(&ct->fence_lookup, g2h_fence.seqno);
+                       xa_erase(&ct->fence_lookup, g2h_fence.seqno);
 
                return ret;
        }
@@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ retry_same_fence:
        if (!ret) {
                xe_gt_err(gt, "Timed out wait for G2H, fence %u, action %04x, done %s",
                          g2h_fence.seqno, action[0], str_yes_no(g2h_fence.done));
-               xa_erase_irq(&ct->fence_lookup, g2h_fence.seqno);
+               xa_erase(&ct->fence_lookup, g2h_fence.seqno);
                mutex_unlock(&ct->lock);
                return -ETIME;
        }