Right now, we cannot have split PT locks because 8xx does not support SMP.
But for the sake of documentation *why* 8xx is fine regarding what we
documented in huge_pte_lockptr(), let's just add code to enforce it at the
same time as documenting it.
This should also make everybody who wants to copy from the 8xx approach of
supporting such unusual ways of mapping hugetlb folios aware that it gets
tricky once multiple page tables are involved.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240726150728.3159964-4-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
}
#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_8xx)
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) || defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS)
+/* We need the same lock to protect the PMD table and the two PTE tables. */
+#error "8M hugetlb folios are incompatible with split page table locks"
+#endif
+
static void __set_huge_pte_at(pmd_t *pmd, pte_t *ptep, pte_basic_t val)
{
pte_basic_t *entry = (pte_basic_t *)ptep;