cpufreq: rename __cpufreq_set_policy() as cpufreq_set_policy()

Earlier there used to be two functions named __cpufreq_set_policy() and
cpufreq_set_policy(), but now we only have a single routine lets name it
cpufreq_set_policy() instead of __cpufreq_set_policy().

This also removes some invalid comments or fixes some incorrect comments.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index b04a5d6f13dfbd03b7698ef1303408e06b700570..3a811df43e146f908dd272a196a9f2cde86395d8 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ show_one(scaling_min_freq, min);
 show_one(scaling_max_freq, max);
 show_one(scaling_cur_freq, cur);
 
-static int __cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
                                struct cpufreq_policy *new_policy);
 
 /**
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static ssize_t store_##file_name                                    \
        if (ret != 1)                                                   \
                return -EINVAL;                                         \
                                                                        \
-       ret = __cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);                \
+       ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);          \
        policy->user_policy.object = policy->object;                    \
                                                                        \
        return ret ? ret : count;                                       \
@@ -491,11 +491,7 @@ static ssize_t store_scaling_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
                                                &new_policy.governor))
                return -EINVAL;
 
-       /*
-        * Do not use cpufreq_set_policy here or the user_policy.max
-        * will be wrongly overridden
-        */
-       ret = __cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
+       ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
 
        policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy;
        policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor;
@@ -837,11 +833,11 @@ static void cpufreq_init_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
        int ret = 0;
 
        memcpy(&new_policy, policy, sizeof(*policy));
-       /* assure that the starting sequence is run in __cpufreq_set_policy */
+       /* assure that the starting sequence is run in cpufreq_set_policy */
        policy->governor = NULL;
 
        /* set default policy */
-       ret = __cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
+       ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
        policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy;
        policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor;
 
@@ -1846,10 +1842,10 @@ int cpufreq_get_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_get_policy);
 
 /*
- * data   : current policy.
- * policy : policy to be set.
+ * policy : current policy.
+ * new_policy: policy to be set.
  */
-static int __cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
                                struct cpufreq_policy *new_policy)
 {
        int ret = 0, failed = 1;
@@ -1995,7 +1991,7 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
                }
        }
 
-       ret = __cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
+       ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
 
        unlock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);