mfd: max77686: Use a generic name for the PMIC node in the example

The ePAPR standard says that: "the name of a node should be somewhat
generic, reflecting the function of the device and not its precise
programming model."

So, change the max77686 binding document example to use a generic
node name instead of using the chip's name.

Suggested-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt
index 8221102d3fc25e5f9e67fb49f704c55ea0852c2f..d2ed3c20a5c3f8bded6a8ac69e3d8a70a195f2c2 100644 (file)
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ to get matched with their hardware counterparts as follow:
 
 Example:
 
-       max77686@09 {
+       max77686: pmic@09 {
                compatible = "maxim,max77686";
                interrupt-parent = <&wakeup_eint>;
                interrupts = <26 0>;