net: phylink: improve phylink_sfp_config_phy() error message with missing PHY driver

net: phylink: improve phylink_sfp_config_phy() error message with missing PHY driver

It seems that phylink does not support driving PHYs in SFP modules using
the Generic PHY or Generic Clause 45 PHY driver. I've come to this
conclusion after analyzing these facts:

- sfp_sm_probe_phy(), who is our caller here, first calls
  phy_device_register() and then sfp_add_phy() -> ... ->
  phylink_sfp_connect_phy().

- phydev->supported is populated by phy_probe()

- phy_probe() is usually called synchronously from phy_device_register()
  via phy_bus_match(), if a precise device driver is found for the PHY.
  In that case, phydev->supported has a good chance of being set to a
  non-zero mask.

- There is an exceptional case for the PHYs for which phy_bus_match()
  didn't find a driver. Those devices sit for a while without a driver,
  then phy_attach_direct() force-binds the genphy_c45_driver or
  genphy_driver to them. Again, this triggers phy_probe() and renders
  a good chance of phydev->supported being populated, assuming
  compatibility with genphy_read_abilities() or
  genphy_c45_pma_read_abilities().

- phylink_sfp_config_phy() does not support the exceptional case of
  retrieving phydev->supported from the Generic PHY driver, due to its
  code flow. It expects the phydev->supported mask to already be
  non-empty, because it first calls phylink_validate() on it, and only
  calls phylink_attach_phy() if that succeeds. Thus, phylink_attach_phy()
  -> phy_attach_direct() has no chance of running.

It is not my wish to change the state of affairs by altering the code
flow, but merely to document the limitation rather than have the current
unspecific error:

[   61.800079] mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12 sfp: validation with support 00,00000000,00000000,00000000 failed: -EINVAL
[   61.820743] sfp sfp: sfp_add_phy failed: -EINVAL

On the premise that an empty phydev->supported is going to make
phylink_validate() fail anyway, and that this is caused by a missing PHY
driver, it would be more informative to single out that case, undercut
the entire phylink_sfp_config_phy() call, including phylink_validate(),
and print a more specific message for this common gotcha:

[   37.076403] mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12 sfp: PHY i2c:sfp:16 (id 0x01410cc2) has no driver loaded
[   37.089157] mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12 sfp: Drivers which handle known common cases: CONFIG_BCM84881_PHY, CONFIG_MARVELL_PHY
[   37.108047] sfp sfp: sfp_add_phy failed: -EINVAL

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241113144229.3ff4bgsalvj7spb7@skbuf/
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241212140834.278894-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>