Revert "mm: introduce PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM, PF_MEMALLOC_NOWARN"

Revert "mm: introduce PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM, PF_MEMALLOC_NOWARN"

This reverts commit eab0af905bfc3e9c05da2ca163d76a1513159aa4.

There is no existing user of those flags.  PF_MEMALLOC_NOWARN is dangerous
because a nested allocation context can use GFP_NOFAIL which could cause
unexpected failure.  Such a code would be hard to maintain because it
could be deeper in the call chain.

PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM has been added even when it was pointed out [1] that
such a allocation contex is inherently unsafe if the context doesn't fully
control all allocations called from this context.

While PF_MEMALLOC_NOWARN is not dangerous the way PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM is
it doesn't have any user and as Matthew has pointed out we are running out
of those flags so better reclaim it without any real users.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZcM0xtlKbAOFjv5n@tiehlicka/

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240926172940.167084-3-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>