KVM: nVMX: Explicitly invalidate posted_intr_nv if PI is disabled at VM-Enter

KVM: nVMX: Explicitly invalidate posted_intr_nv if PI is disabled at VM-Enter

Explicitly invalidate posted_intr_nv when emulating nested VM-Enter and
posted interrupts are disabled to make it clear that posted_intr_nv is
valid if and only if nested posted interrupts are enabled, and as a cheap
way to harden against KVM bugs.

KVM initializes posted_intr_nv to -1 at vCPU creation and resets it to -1
when unloading vmcs12 and/or leaving nested mode, i.e. this is not a bug
fix (or at least, it's not intended to be a bug fix).

Note, tracking nested.posted_intr_nv as a u16 subtly adds a measure of
safety, as it prevents unintentionally matching KVM's informal "no IRQ"
vector of -1, stored as a signed int.  Because a u16 can be always be
represented as a signed int, the effective "invalid" value of
posted_intr_nv, 65535, will be preserved as-is when comparing against an
int, i.e. will be zero-extended, not sign-extended, and thus won't get a
false positive if KVM is buggy and compares posted_intr_nv against -1.

Opportunistically add a comment in vmx_deliver_nested_posted_interrupt()
to call out that it must check vmx->nested.posted_intr_nv, not the vector
in vmcs12, which is presumably the _entire_ reason nested.posted_intr_nv
exists.  E.g. vmcs12 is a KVM-controlled snapshot, so there are no TOCTOU
races to worry about, the only potential badness is if the vCPU leaves
nested and frees vmcs12 between the sender checking is_guest_mode() and
dereferencing the vmcs12 pointer.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240906043413.1049633-7-seanjc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>