[patch] Allow any filesystem on MTD Nand when Read Only
panto at intracom.gr
Thu May 6 05:45:17 EDT 2004
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>On Thursday 06 May 2004 11:30, Srinivasu.Vaduguri at nokia.com wrote:
>>>How many times have you written the block in order for something like
>>>this to occur?
>>I haven't counted the number of times. But I remember reading some
>>information, that even on multiple reads we do get bit errors and it is a
>>symptom that the block slowly becoming bad after some time.
>Hmm. Never seen this. I have some read only paritions which are accessed in
>stress testing and I never have seen, that a block gets bad due to reading.
>>But what I feel is, a read-only filesystem like cramfs is not that reliable
>>on NAND flash. We have to detect a bad block early.
>Yep, but you can only detect it while writing / erasing.
Actually when using ECC you *CAN* detect a single bit error.
You could use this information as a trigger to migrate the block
and then mark it bad immediately.
However it better be only one bit that flipped because if more
bits are gone you're screwed.
More information about the linux-mtd